Ukrainians in Kyiv have expressed cautious relief and strong opposition to territorial concessions amid discussions of a potential meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, driven by U.S. diplomatic efforts. This reaction follows recent high-level talks involving international leaders, highlighting deep-seated distrust towards Russia and the complexities of peace negotiations.
Who is involved: The key figures are Ukrainian citizens, particularly residents of Kyiv, who are directly affected by the ongoing conflict. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin are central to the proposed meeting, with U.S. President Donald Trump playing a mediating role. European leaders have also engaged in discussions, reflecting broad international concern over the war’s resolution.
What happened: Ukrainians are reacting to the possibility of a summit between Putin and Zelensky, which has been promoted by Trump as a step towards ending the war. Many express relief that diplomatic talks are occurring but firmly reject any idea of ceding Ukrainian territory to Russia. This sentiment was captured in interviews and public statements, emphasizing a desire for peace without compromise on sovereignty.
When it occurred: The reactions emerged on August 19, 2025, immediately following a series of diplomatic events, including Trump’s meeting with Putin in Alaska and Zelensky’s discussions with Trump and European leaders at the White House on August 18, 2025. The timing coincides with heightened media coverage and public awareness of these developments.
Where it took place: The reactions are primarily centered in Kyiv, Ukraine, where residents are living through the realities of war. The diplomatic efforts span multiple locations, including Alaska for the Trump-Putin summit and Washington, D.C., for talks involving Zelensky, underscoring the global nature of the conflict and peace initiatives.
Why it is happening: The push for a Putin-Zelensky meeting stems from Trump’s belief that face-to-face dialogue is essential to end the war, as part of his broader diplomatic strategy. Ukrainians are reacting due to fears that such a meeting could lead to pressure for concessions, given Russia’s historical aggression and ongoing military actions. The underlying motivation is to achieve a lasting peace while preserving Ukraine’s territorial integrity.
How it unfolded: CNN conducted interviews with Kyiv residents, capturing their emotional responses and rational concerns. Zelensky has publicly stated readiness to engage with Trump but ruled out territorial compromises, while Russian officials have shown mixed reactions, with some opposing any meeting with Zelensky due to questions about his legitimacy. This has created a complex diplomatic landscape with no immediate resolution.
Impact: The reactions highlight the deep divisions and trauma caused by the war, influencing international perceptions and potentially shaping future negotiations. If a meeting occurs, it could either advance peace talks or exacerbate tensions, depending on the outcomes. Domestically, it affects Ukrainian morale and unity, as citizens grapple with the balance between hope for peace and resistance to aggression.
What’s next: The focus will be on whether Trump can facilitate a trilateral or bilateral meeting, with close monitoring of any shifts in stance from Moscow or Kyiv. International actors, including European allies, will likely continue to advocate for a solution that respects Ukraine’s sovereignty. The situation remains fluid, with the potential for further diplomatic engagements or escalations in the conflict.