In a televised interview on CNN’s ‘The Lead’ today, former FBI Section Chief John F. Sullivan III launched a scathing critique of current FBI Director Kash Patel, branding him a ‘conspiracy peddler.’ Sullivan, who served in the bureau’s intelligence division, expressed grave concerns about Patel’s leadership and his promotion of unfounded theories, which he argued undermines the FBI’s integrity and effectiveness.
Sullivan’s comments came during a segment hosted by Jake Tapper, where he detailed his observations from his tenure and since Patel’s appointment. The interview, aired on January 23, 2026, highlighted the ongoing internal discord within the FBI under Patel’s direction. Sullivan emphasized that Patel’s actions have eroded trust both within the agency and among the public, posing risks to national security.
Kash Patel was selected by former President Donald Trump to lead the FBI, a move that sparked controversy due to Patel’s lack of traditional law enforcement experience and his history of espousing conspiracy theories. Since taking office, Patel has been accused of prioritizing political loyalty over professional standards, leading to friction with career officials like Sullivan.
Specifically, Sullivan pointed to instances where Patel has publicly endorsed debunked claims, such as those related to election fraud or other partisan narratives. He argued that this behavior not only distracts from the FBI’s core missions but also fuels polarization and mistrust in institutions. The former section chief warned that such rhetoric could compromise ongoing investigations and the bureau’s ability to combat real threats.
The criticism from Sullivan is not isolated; similar sentiments have been echoed in reports from other outlets like local3news.com, which also covered the interview. This suggests a broader unease among former and current FBI personnel about Patel’s leadership style and the direction of the agency under his watch.
The public nature of Sullivan’s rebuke may have significant implications. It could embolden other critics within the FBI or lead to increased scrutiny from Congress and oversight bodies. As the 2026 elections approach, the stability and credibility of the FBI are crucial, and such internal conflicts might impact its role in ensuring electoral security and other critical functions.
Looking ahead, the fallout from this interview may prompt calls for greater accountability or even challenges to Patel’s authority. The FBI faces the task of navigating these internal divisions while maintaining its duties, and Sullivan’s comments underscore the urgent need for leadership that prioritizes facts and professionalism over partisan agendas.
