Tuesday, December 23, 2025
HomePolitics & SocietyAustralia was seen as a world leader in gun control - Bondi...

Australia was seen as a world leader in gun control – Bondi has exposed a more complicated reality

A deadly shooting at Bondi Beach on Sunday killed 15 people and injured 42 during a Hanukkah celebration, prompting the Australian government to announce stringent new gun laws within 48 hours, exposing complexities in the nation’s firearm regulations.

The attack occurred on Sunday afternoon at Sydney’s popular Bondi Beach, where two gunmen, identified as father and son Sajid and Naveed Akram, opened fire on a crowd. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese labeled it a terrorist incident, with the younger Akram previously investigated for links to Islamic State. Sajid Akram, killed at the scene, owned six registered firearms, highlighting gaps in licensing. The swift response included an emergency National Cabinet meeting to address reforms.

Australian leaders agreed on proposals including a national gun buyback scheme, caps on firearms per owner, and stricter licensing such as requiring citizenship for ownership. Efforts will accelerate the establishment of a National Firearms Register, delayed for years. Albanese emphasized regular reviews of license holders to account for radicalization risks.

Australia’s gun control framework dates to the 1996 Port Arthur massacre, which led to the National Firearms Agreement and destruction of over 650,000 weapons. This unified state laws and banned semi-automatic rifles, reducing gun violence. However, recent reports show over four million firearms in private hands, with inconsistent implementation across states. Loopholes like easy recreational hunting licenses have undermined safety.

Gun control advocate Roland Browne, key in Port Arthur reforms, expressed disappointment that tragedies spur action. He calls for caps on ownership and abolition of ambiguous hunting licenses, noting the attack used high-powered rifles similar to those banned. Browne stresses the need for updated regulations and preventing illegal markets.

Pro-gun groups like the Sporting Shooters Association, represented by Tom Kenyon, oppose restrictions. Kenyon argues limits won’t prevent radicalized attacks and resources should focus on intelligence-sharing. He cites the Nice truck attack to show alternative means, defending hunting as valuable for controlling feral animals and community traditions.

The political response was enabled by Australia’s National Cabinet, allowing rapid consensus among state leaders, unlike polarized debates in the U.S. Public support remains strong, with polls showing 64% favoring stronger laws, prioritizing public safety over gun rights. This consensus facilitates swift implementation of reforms.

The Bondi shooting has reignited gun control discussions, revealing gaps between historical successes and current realities. While mass shootings are rare, vulnerabilities like the lack of a national register persist. Future effectiveness depends on consistent enforcement and addressing radicalization and illegal trafficking, underscoring the need for vigilant policy adaptation.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments