Meghan King, an alumna of ‘The Real Housewives of Orange County,’ has temporarily lost physical custody of her three children to her ex-husband, former MLB player Jim Edmonds, following a Child Protective Services investigation prompted by a school employee’s call. The decision, made in recent months, grants King supervised visitation while a hearing in early December will determine if the arrangement becomes permanent.
The custody change was implemented after a school employee contacted Child Protective Services regarding King, leading to an investigation that resulted in Edmonds gaining sole physical custody. Sources close to the matter indicate that the call raised unspecified concerns, though details of the allegations have not been publicly disclosed. This shift underscores the serious nature of the intervention and its impact on the family’s dynamics, with both Us Weekly and People reporting the developments exclusively.
King and Edmonds, who were married from 2014 to 2019 and finalized their divorce in May 2021, previously shared joint custody of their children: daughter Aspen, 8, and twin sons Hart and Hayes, 7. The former couple’s co-parenting arrangement had been in place for years, but the recent CPS involvement has upended that balance, highlighting ongoing challenges in their post-divorce relationship. Edmonds has since remarried to Kortnie Edmonds in 2022, adding another layer to the family’s complex interactions.
This custody loss comes amid a history of public disputes between King and Edmonds, including a notable incident in May 2025 when King visited Edmonds’ home to drop off clothes for their daughter. Kortnie Edmonds called the police, alleging that King entered the residence without permission, and bodycam footage obtained by Us Weekly captured King accusing Jim Edmonds of being ’emotionally abusive.’ No charges were filed in that altercation, and Kortnie later withdrew her complaint, but it exemplifies the tensions that have persisted since the divorce.
The temporary custody arrangement is set to be reviewed in a hearing scheduled for early December, where a judge will evaluate whether to make the changes permanent. Both parties have been approached for comment, with Edmonds’ representative declining to provide additional details and King not immediately responding to requests. The hearing’s outcome could significantly influence future co-parenting efforts and legal precedents in similar high-profile cases.
This development emphasizes the broader implications for child welfare in contentious divorces, particularly when allegations involve external agencies like CPS. The situation sheds light on how such investigations can lead to swift custody modifications, potentially affecting the children’s stability and well-being. As the December hearing approaches, observers are watching closely to see how the court balances the parents’ rights with the best interests of the children involved.
In summary, the custody battle between Meghan King and Jim Edmonds reflects deeper issues of trust and conflict resolution, with the upcoming decision poised to shape their family’s future. The involvement of Child Protective Services adds a layer of scrutiny, reminding us of the importance of safeguarding children in volatile environments. Regardless of the outcome, this case serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of co-parenting under public scrutiny.
