The Environmental Protection Agency has suspended over 100 employees without pay for signing a letter of dissent against the Trump administration’s policies, a move that the employees’ union condemns as an attack on free speech and an effort to silence internal criticism. This disciplinary action, involving 14-day suspensions without pay, was taken this week and follows earlier firings, highlighting ongoing tensions within the agency.
The suspensions were announced on Thursday, September 4, 2025, targeting more than 100 staffers who had signed an open letter in July expressing deep concerns about the EPA’s direction under the current administration. The letter criticized the agency for allegedly ignoring scientific consensus, favoring polluters, and abandoning its core mission to protect human health and the environment. Employees argued that these actions have created a culture of fear, forcing staff to choose between their jobs and speaking out against perceived harms.
This recent crackdown is part of a broader series of disciplinary measures that began in July, when approximately 140 employees were placed on administrative leave after signing the dissent letter. Last week, the EPA fired nine probationary employees and issued removal notices to six others, escalating the response to what the agency describes as unacceptable conduct. The union, AFGE Council 238, estimates that these actions have collectively wasted over 47,000 work hours and $2 million in taxpayer funds, citing inefficiency and retaliation as motives.
Justin Chen, president of the union, stated that the suspensions and firings are not about improving government efficiency or public safety but are intended to squash dissent and prevent employees from advocating for environmental protections. He emphasized that the workers bravely voiced legitimate concerns about policies that threaten American lives and called for the immediate reinstatement of all affected staff, revocation of disciplinary actions, and an end to what he labels a violation of free speech rights.
The EPA has declined to comment on specific personnel matters, reiterating through a spokesperson that it has a zero-tolerance policy for employees using their positions to undermine the will of the American public, as expressed in the recent election. The agency maintains that the dissenting employees represent only a small fraction of its dedicated workforce and that the majority are committed to their roles without attempting to mislead or scare the public.
This incident underscores broader tensions within federal agencies under the Trump administration, where employees have increasingly faced repercussions for opposing policies they view as detrimental. It raises significant questions about the balance between free speech rights for government workers and the administration’s authority to enforce discipline and alignment with its agenda. Legal experts and advocacy groups are watching closely, as the union may pursue challenges based on whistleblower protections or First Amendment grounds.
The implications extend beyond the EPA, potentially influencing how other agencies handle internal dissent and employee activism. Lawmakers, particularly Democrats, have already called for investigations and the reinstatement of workers, framing the issue as a matter of governmental transparency and accountability. As the situation develops, it could lead to further congressional hearings, public debate, and possible policy changes affecting federal employment standards.