Survivors and family members of victims from the 2023 Maine mass shooting have filed a lawsuit against the U.S. government, alleging negligence by military authorities in failing to prevent the tragedy. The legal action involves over 100 plaintiffs and accuses the Army of ignoring warning signs about the shooter’s mental health.
The lawsuit was formally filed in federal court, representing individuals affected by the shooting that occurred on October 25, 2023, in Lewiston, Maine. It targets the U.S. Army, Department of Defense, and Keller Army Community Hospital, claiming they breached their duty of care. Robert Card, the shooter, was an Army reservist who had been hospitalized for mental health issues and had made explicit threats of violence.
Prior to the shooting, family members and fellow soldiers had raised concerns about Card’s behavior and potential for harm. The complaint alleges that the military failed to act on these warnings, which could have included restricting his access to firearms or ensuring he received proper treatment. This negligence, according to the plaintiffs, directly led to the deaths of 18 people and injuries to numerous others.
The mass shooting took place at a bowling alley and a bar, shocking the small community and the nation. Card was found dead two days later from a self-inflicted gunshot wound after an extensive manhunt. The event has been one of the deadliest mass shootings in U.S. history, prompting widespread debate on gun control and mental health policies.
The lawsuit seeks compensation for the immense pain, suffering, and financial losses endured by the victims and their families. It highlights what plaintiffs describe as systemic failures within the military’s handling of mental health crises among personnel. Legal proceedings are based on the Federal Tort Claims Act, which allows lawsuits against the federal government under certain conditions.
This filing comes after a notice of intent to sue was served in October 2024, giving the government six months to investigate the claims. The current action moves the process forward, aiming for accountability and justice. The case is expected to be closely watched for its implications on governmental responsibility and prevention of future tragedies.
As the legal battle unfolds, it may influence broader discussions on how institutions address mental health and firearm access, potentially leading to policy reforms. The survivors and families hope that this lawsuit will not only provide them with closure but also prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.
