Tensions between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the military leadership have sharply escalated over the planned assault on Gaza City, with the army chief expressing strong reservations about the operation’s risks and humanitarian costs. This confrontation highlights deepening internal divisions as Israel prepares for a major offensive.
In recent security cabinet meetings, IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir directly challenged Netanyahu’s decision to expand the military campaign into Gaza City. Zamir raised concerns about the safety of the 48 Israeli hostages still held in Gaza and the potential for high casualties among soldiers involved in the operation. He also warned about the displacement of up to one million Palestinians and the strategic ramifications of a full Israeli occupation of the Gaza Strip.
Netanyahu dismissed these objections, insisting on a comprehensive deal for all hostages and citing support from US President Donald Trump for a forceful approach. The prime minister refused to discuss a ceasefire proposal accepted by Hamas, which Zamir had urged the cabinet to consider. This refusal has intensified the rift, with Netanyahu’s far-right allies accusing Zamir of weakness and defeatism.
The military chief’s opposition is particularly significant because Zamir was appointed directly by Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz, initially seen as a loyal figure. However, he has become a target for frustration over the war’s prolonged nature and lack of clear objectives. The disagreement has escalated to personal attacks, including from Netanyahu’s son, Yair, who accused Zamir of leading a “rebellion and attempted military coup reminiscent of banana republics.”
Background tensions between Netanyahu’s government and the military echelon have been chronic since the cabinet was sworn in, often over dismissals of military advice. This latest clash is part of a broader pattern where hardline political allies frequently clash with the army over policies in Gaza and the occupied West Bank. Nearly two years of war have exacerbated these divisions, with Netanyahu attempting to deflect responsibility for security lapses.
In response to the planned operation, a group of Israeli reservists announced they would refuse to report for duty, citing concerns for hostage safety and the humanitarian toll. The movement, called “Soldiers for Hostages,” held a news conference in Tel Aviv and argued that the order to conquer Gaza City is illegal and immoral. They sent a letter to the Military Advocate General calling for the offensive to be stopped.
The situation underscores the internal challenges Israel faces as it continues its military campaign, with implications for the war’s direction and Israel’s security policies. The rift could affect military morale and public support, potentially complicating future operations.
As the standoff continues, the focus is on whether Netanyahu will proceed with the assault despite military objections or seek a diplomatic solution. The outcome may influence hostage negotiations and regional stability, with ongoing mediation efforts by Egypt and Qatar.
