Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., to carry their service weapons, marking a significant escalation in the federal government’s crime reduction efforts under President Trump’s administration. This policy shift aims to enhance law enforcement presence but raises concerns about militarization and civil liberties.
On August 22, 2025, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a directive authorizing National Guard members deployed in Washington, D.C., to carry their service weapons while on patrol. This decision represents a change from previous Pentagon guidance, which allowed for weapons based on mission requirements, and now mandates arming for all troops involved in the crime crackdown mission.
The order affects over 1,900 National Guard personnel from multiple states, including West Virginia, South Carolina, Mississippi, Ohio, Louisiana, and Tennessee, who have been called up to assist the D.C. National Guard. These troops began arriving in the capital earlier in the week and are being stationed at various locations, such as Metro stations and tourist areas like the National Mall.
This move is part of President Donald Trump’s broader initiative to address crime in D.C., which began with his assertion of federal authority over the local police department in early August. The administration has described the crime situation as an epidemic, necessitating increased law enforcement presence and more aggressive measures.
The rationale for arming the troops is to ensure they are prepared for any contingencies and to enhance their effectiveness in supporting law enforcement operations. However, this policy change has sparked debate over the appropriateness of military personnel carrying weapons in a domestic policing role, with concerns about potential escalations, civil liberties issues, and the impact on community relations.
The impact of this decision could include increased visibility and deterrence of crime, but also risks of militarizing urban spaces and straining trust between residents and authorities. There are logistical and training considerations for the troops involved, including rules of engagement and de-escalation protocols.
Looking forward, the Trump administration has indicated plans to potentially extend similar measures to other cities like New York and Chicago, suggesting a nationwide approach to crime reduction using National Guard and federal resources. The situation is evolving, with ongoing assessments of the mission’s effectiveness and public response, and could lead to further policy adjustments or legal challenges.
